“Hindu Mythology. the descent of a deity to the earth in an incarnate form or some manifest shape; the incarnation of a god.”

However, let me re-emphasised my stand as follows :-

It is undisputed fact that all the messengers of God duty are to reform,therefore, it is related with this FACTUAL SENSE or CONTEX that Hazrat Ahmad claimed to be an Avtar of Krishna, not in the sense or contex that you deem it to be, that is REINCARNATED, because being a muslim I do not take reincarnated something as a
FACT.

It is something that does not exist in the teaching of Islam, therefore, cannot be taken whether in metaphoric or literal sense or contex, such thing simply doesn’t exit in Islam and I do not beleive it does, so, how am I going to translate something that that does not exit in whatever sense (be it metaphoric or litera?).

Please try to understand, there is nothing more to be discussed,
Thanks for your prayer, God bless you brother.

Matter closed.

Bohras may also claim the same. Melancholia and Impotency were proof of Mirza [shit be upon him] truly cursed.

excellent article brother Fuad. Mirza is Yalash and Yalash is Mirza rotf.

Then I gave an evidence which proves that Mirza Sb claims to be Krishan for Hindus just as he claims to be Messiah for Muslims. So if he claim of Krishan is metaphor, the claim for Messiah is also a metaphor. Here you simply closed the matter because you think it is foolish to explain beliefs of Ahmadis to others.

Why is it foolish, by the way? This blog is being read by Muslims and Ahmadis all over the world. You have a golden opportunity to explain your religion and call people to accept your belief. But you think it is foolish - why? Please don’t run away and I request you evaluate the truth and accept the truth whatever it is. May Allah help you to look for truth. Amin

If you don’t have answers that is fine, we cannot push to reply.

As far as I am concern, I have dealt with the matter clearly and stand firm with my understanding as follows;=

a)Metaphoric sense in the contex of duty field (to reform)

b)Not, metaphoric sense in the contex of reincarnation.

I believe if you were to read sincerely all the books,articles etc,
with regard to Isa Al-Maseeh in the light of Qura’anic teaching, you would certainly find the truth in the Ahmadiyya view points against the others.

I do not find the neccessity to engage with another polemic with you, lest, I might be taken by others as “A FOOL NEVER LEARNT” as well.

ME RUNNING AWAY? NO WAY!!, SINCE YOU LOVE TO SWAY!!! I HAVE TO GIVE YOU WAY, AND DO YOU KNOW WHAT? AM SICK OF YOU ANYWAY!!!.

That’s final, I wouldn’t be entertaining you further, as I said, lest, I might taken by others as “A FOOL NEVER LEARNT” as well.

Matter closed.

QUOTE-as far as I am concern Hazrat Ahmad is not the reincarnation of Krishna in whatever sense-UNQUOTE

This is against the writings of Mirza Sb. He has categorically made a claim that he is an AVTAR of KRISHNA but as far as you are concerned you don’t agree with Mirza Sb. Right?

Believing in Maseeh is your basic belief, you should have got enough knowledge to answer a very simple question. I have read the books of Ahmadiyya and it is very difficult to figure out your actual belief. That is why I requested a practicing and faithful Ahmadi to answer some simple questions so that every one could learn clearly about your religion.

The question I asked is actually connected to the debate of re-incarnation, because Mirza Sb says on the same page of Lecture Sialkot:

“just as God has sent me as Promised Messiah for Muslims and Christians, similarly I am like an Autar for Hindus”

Note the words “just as”. So if Mirza Sb was Krishna in a metaphoric sense than his claim for being Messiah is also metaphoric and real Maseeh has yet to come. However, if he was actually an Avtar of Krishna then he made a claim for actually being Promised Messiah.

I understand your knowledge about Ahmadi Beliefs is not that of an expert, that is why you denied in the very beginning and are still denying that Mirza Sb was an avtar (re-incarnate) of Krishna. However, I would request you to check these details with a cool mind. Let me also say that please don’t deny the truth if it did not originally belonged to you. Please make a decision you will follow the truth and you will preach the truth. I have made that decision and if I get convinced that Mirza Sb was a prophet of God I will definitely become an Ahmadi - but I want to evaluate his claims without any bias. The kind of language you use generally make it difficult to leave bias behind.

Similarly, I will request you to evaluate claims of Mirza Sb impartially and don’t use arguments like, “there are many books,you can always avail yourself with from Ahmadiyya library”. If you are a believer in him, you should have knowledge about him to answer simple questions - that will open the way for people to accept your belief. However, if you keep on using harsh language and running away from topics people will definitely call you a cult.