Who is following “True Islam”?

بسم الله الحمد لله و صلاة و سلام على محمد و على آله و سلم

Lets start with two simple questions:

Was the Islam that the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه و سلم was upon “True Islam”? Undoubtedly Yes.

Is the Islam practiced by Muslims today the “True Islam”? Muslims would argue Yes, and the Ahmadiyya would argue No.

Assuming that the Islam practiced by the Muslims today is no longer “True Islam”, that would imply that somewhere in the last 1432 years separating us from the Prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم all Muslims spontaneously and simultaneously went astray in belief, hence the need for Mirza Ghulam to create the Ahmadiyya faith. This is the standard Ahmadiyya narrative and it seems to make sense.

But lets take a closer look….turn back the clock 1300 years.
Continue reading

It Would Have Been Abu Bakr

بسم الله الحد لله و صلاة و سلام على رسول الله و على آله و سلم

Amongst the claims of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was that he was so close to the Prophet Muhammad صلى لله عليه و سلم that he became the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه و سلم. He wrote, “In short, my Prophethood and messengership is only by virtue of my being Muhammad and Ahmad, and not in my own right; and I have been given this name because of my complete devotion to the Holy Prophet.”

For those who might not know, this is loosely based on the Sufi concept of Fana’ (obliteration of the self in the personality of another), taken literally. In other words, Mirza Ghulam said that he was so much like the Prophet Muhammad صلى لله عليه و سلم that “no degree of estrangement” existed between the two.

But lets take a step back for a moment. What about Abu Bakr? Did he obliterate himself in the Prophet Muhammad صلى لله عليه و سلم? If so, why did he not “become” Muhammad صلى لله عليه و سلم, even more so than Mirza? Lets compare Abu Bakr رضى الله عنه to Mirza Ghulam.
Continue reading

Attacking the fundamentals of Islam to defend Mirza Ghulam Ahmad

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم الحمد لله وحده و الصلاة و السلام على من لا نبي بعده و على آله و أصحابه أجمعين

In one of his works, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani attributes a hadith to Imam al-Bukhari’s collection which does not exist in it. See Rohani Khazain vol.6 p.337 (هذا خليفة الله المهدى)

In their bid to defend Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, his followers take a lot of pain. Malik Abdul Rahman, author of the much celebrated Ahmadiyya Pocket Book, not only clutches at straws but goes even further to put doubt to the very fundamentals of Islam to justify the gimmicks of the false claimant of prophethood.

In the Ahmadiyya Pocket Book, pages 517-518, he comes up with various arguments to dilute the issue and presents the worst possible alternatives.

He alludes to two Ahadith of the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم:

Narrations about the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم erring about the number of raka’ahs:

Firstly, there is a narration in which the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم mistakenly said the final salaam of ritual prayers (salaah) at the end of two raka’ahs instead of four raka’ahs..

Continue reading

True vs Fake Spirituality

Earlier this week, a friend of mine was in a car accident. I did not think much of it until this Jumu’ah when I learned the extent of the accident. A truck hit him from behind, causing his car to spin out of control into oncoming traffic, where he hit another truck. His mother, who was in the passenger seat, came out without a scratch. But it took three hours for the paramedics to pull him from the wreckage. His spinal cord endured severe compression. In an instant, he became paralyzed from the neck down: Quadriplegic.

We’re driving to see him tomorrow in Pennsylvania. May Allah make it easy on him, give him the patience of Ayub and Yusuf and certainty in the plan of his Lord. Please make a du’a for him. Ameen.

In our modern times, spirituality has been cheapened to merely singing poetry or abstractions of being “close to Allah” without any tangible effects. I am certainly not condemning either expression of love of Allah and his prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم, both are important. My contention is with skin-deep manifestations of spirituality.

Your average person very likely has some difficulty, pain or stress in his life. This can come in many forms, from an alcoholic struggling to quit, to cancer patient dying in solitude, to someone addicted to pornography. The challenge is to endure the test and do that which Allah wills, despite the difficulty. This intense struggle for Allah is spirituality. There is nothing more spiritual than being in a broken, destitute state, yet calling out the name of God with full conviction. It is not always rosey or romantic, but it constitutes a more complete form of submission and worship to Allah. And that is our ultimately purpose in life.

Some Sufis speak of Fana’, the obliteration of the self. They say that when one is able to seek Allah despite the many impediments in his way, rid himself of the diseases in his heart, and follow the will of Allah, it is as if he is destroying his sense of self-being and replacing it with Allah’s. This self-obliteration happens to such a degree that we are replaced with the will of Allah and the Prophet صلى لله عليه و سلم and “become the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه و سلم”. Needless to say, this language is purely metaphorical, was not meant for the masses to be read and interpreted without a teacher, and was never meant to be taken literally in any capacity.

But, Mirza Ghulam’s claim to have become Muhammad صلى الله عليه و سلم lays in the crack between the literal and metaphorical. He takes the notion of Fana’ literally, and claimed that this is how he became the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه و سلم, in “A Misconception Removed”.

If one could “become” Muhammad صلى الله عليه و سلم in any capacity, it would have been Saydina Abu Bakr رضى الله عنه. Abu Bakr knew the Prophet before Islam, he was the first adult male to accept Islam, he married his daughter to the Prophet, he suffered for 13 years in Makkah with the Prophet, then fought for 10 years while living in Madinah, he was chosen to spend 11 days alone with the Prophet during the hijrah, there are at least two ayaat implicitly referencing him, he fought in many battles with him, ate with him, looked upon the blessed face of the Prophet, became the first Khalifa, etc. He even died at the same age as the Prophet, and was buried next to him! Abu Bakr had the most right to claim to have obliterated himself in the Prophet than any soul to ever exist, yet he never made such a claim. But Mirza Ghulam had the gaul to claim to have completely become Muhammad صلى الله عليه و سلم, in effect placing himself above Abu Bakr. This, from a man whose followers must posit excuses for why he never once performed Hajj.

Spirituality does not lead to arrogance and self-aggrandizement, such as claiming to be the “second coming” of anyone. In fact, it often makes one more aware of his own short-comings. For example, ’Umar bin al-Khattab, the second Khalifah, was terrified that he was written as a munafiq (hypocrite). Abu Hurayrah, the most prolific narrator of Hadith, was once asked about his status and responded that he is just another nameless Muslim among many. True spirituality does not lead to “Look how spiritual I am, I have become Muhammad صلى الله عليه و سلم”. It leads to humility and deep concern for one’s final abode.

What my friend has endured is a severe test. Through it, may he increase in his degrees and ranks with Allah. This is spirituality, not mere fancy language and poetry. Imam al-Ghazali warned of people who have merely learned some of the terminology of the Sufis, yet know nothing of its reality. May Allah guide us all to what is true, and keep us safe from Falsehood.

And please make Du’a for my friend.

و صلى الله عليه سيدنا محمد و على آله و سلم

Comments on “Ameer UK’s Jamaat Office and the Mysterious Disappearance (ahem ahem theft) of £400,000!”

بسم الله الحمد لله و صلاة و سلام على رسول الله و على آله و سلم

Recently, Sr. “Findings” released a secret internal document regarding the theft of £400,000 ($624,840) and the subsequent cover-up. Her blog post is here: Confessions of a Cult Girl.

£400,000 is a big deal, I am not denying it. But this itself does not make the Ahmadiyya faith false, nor is this unique to Ahmadiyya. Instead, this draws into question Chanda, a law invented by Mirza Ghulam mandating payments to the religious leadership.

Allow me to paint a scenario: Lets say you believe Mirza Ghulam was Imam Mahdi, metaphorically Maryam عليها السلام, the “second” Messiah عليه السلام, Krishna for the Hindus, a complete manifestation of Muhammad صلى الله عليه و سلم, et al in one. However, due to its mismanagement, dishonesty and its agenda, you lost trust in the people who run the Nizaam. To you, it has gone astray from the true path of Mirza.

[Some Ahmadis]

live under this false notion of “The leaders of Ahmadiyya are men of God, they do no evil”. I guarantee you the governors of ‘Umar [bin Al-Khattab] were closer to Allah and yet were more open to public scrutiny.

But there’s a lingering question. What about Chanda? Can you refuse to pay? Or are you still obligated to pay no matter what? Can you refuse to pay until certian demands are met?

You are not in a position to organize a consciousnesses objection against Chanda until the practice of, say, public humiliations are ended. Why? Because payments are mandatory specifically to the Nizaam! So can you do anything?

There are a few main charities that I contribute to. I researched them to make sure there was no wide-scale abuse, etc. If I felt that one of them was mismanaging its funds through whatever means (ie, large overhead costs), I would simply refuse to donate to it. And I have exercised this right. Allah has made the practice of giving money a highly praised act, but he did not specify one specific organization, perhaps precisely for this reason!

‘Umar bin al-Khattab رضى الله عنه wanted his governors to live extremely austere lives. He used to take an account of his governor’s savings before and after they took office. Any additional savings were confiscated and redistributed to the treasury of the Muslims. He did not automatically assume that they were all righteous men (even though they were). This is the second khalifah being hard on the Sahaba! So how can some Ahmadis live under this false notion of “The leaders of Ahmadiyya are men of God, they do no evil”. I guarantee you the governors of ‘Umar were closer to Allah and yet were more open to public scrutiny.

If the Nizaam is corrupt, yet you are still required to fund its corruption, something is wrong. Seriously wrong. And as a low-ranking Ahmadi, there seems to be no way distance yourself and your money.

My solution: Chanda is said to also be given to help humanitarian causes around the world. If I was in your shoes, I would withhold my Chanda, cut out the middle man, and give directly to a cause I felt was best. But that’s just me. Then again, I believe Chanda is a Bid’ah.

May Allah guide us all to what is true.

و صلى الله على سيدنا محمد و على آله و سلم

The Four False Prophets, Part IV: Musaylimah al-Kaddhab

بسم الله الحد لله و صلاة و سلام على رسول الله و على آله و سلم

The Four False Prophets: Musaylimah Al-Kaddhab
Al-Aswad Al-’Ansi Tulayhah al-Azdi Sajjah bint al-Harith Musaylimah al-Kaddhab

This is the last installment in a series of articles on four of the early false prophets from the time of the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه و سلم and Abu Bakr رضى الله عنه. In it, we will discuss their rise, opposition by the Muslims, and eventual defeat.

I hope this one will be the most interesting and intense…
Continue reading

The Four False Prophets, Part III: Sajjah bint Harith

بسم الله الحد لله و صلاة و سلام على رسول الله و على آله و سلم

The Four False Prophets
Al-Aswad Al-’Ansi Tulayhah al-Azdi Sajjah bint al-Harith Musaylimah al-Kaddhab

This is the third installment in a series of articles on four of the early false prophets from the time of the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه و سلم and Abu Bakr رضى الله عنه. In it, we will discuss their rise, opposition by the Muslims, and eventual defeat.


Sajjah bint Harith was from a Christian Iraqi tribe named Taghlib. She was beautiful, a master of oratory, poetry, ability to game prophecies (ie, phrasing prophecies in such a way that they always come true). Coincidentally, her tribe held a prophecy of a woman who would become a prophetess. When she heard about the death of the Prophet Ahmad صلى الله عليه و سلم and the rise of other false prophets, she decided to use her skills and claim the prophethood foretold in the prophecy of Banu Taghlib. She join forces with Tulayhah al-Azdi, Musaylimah al-Kaddhab and Malik bin Nuwayrah, an apostate.
-

Ahmadiyya and Ribaa

 بسم الله الحمد لله و صلاة و سلام على رسول الله و على آله و سلم

It is common knowledge that Ribaa (usury) is haraam in Islam. Allah says in the Qur’an,

[3.130] O you who have believed, do not consume usury, doubled and multiplied, but fear Allah that you may be successful.
[4:161And [for] their taking of usury while they had been forbidden from it, and their consuming of the people’s wealth unjustly. And we have prepared for the disbelievers among them a painful punishment.
[30:39And whatever you give for interest to increase within the wealth of people will not increase with Allah. But what you give in zakah, desiring the countenance of Allah – those are the multipliers.
[2:275] Those who consume interest cannot stand [on the Day of Resurrection] except as one stands who is being beaten by Satan into insanity. That is because they say, “Trade is [just] like interest.” But Allah has permitted trade and has forbidden interest. So whoever has received an admonition from his Lord and desists may have what is past, and his affair rests with Allah . But whoever returns to [dealing in interest or usury] – those are the companions of the Fire; they will abide eternally therein.

In fact, Ribaa is the only thing that Allah سبحانه و تعلى and his Messenger صلى الله عليه و سلم declare war on in the entire Qur’an:

[2:278-279] O you who have believed, fear Allah and give up what remains [due to you] of interest, if you should be believers. And if you do not, then be informed of a war [against you] from Allah and His Messenger. But if you repent, you may have your principal – [thus] you do no wrong, nor are you wronged.

The Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم said,
Narrated by Abdullah ibn Mas’ud: The Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) cursed the one who accepted usury, the one who paid it, the witness to it, and the one who recorded it. (Sunan of Abu Dawood, Hadith 3327)

The Ahmadiyya community on the other hand, an organisation whose founder claimed to be the reviver of Islam, an organisation that sees itself as the saved sect of Islam, has no qualms in accepting interest. The following table was taken from the website of the Charity Commission that shows the interest income of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Association United Kingdom in 2010:

(Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2010, p. 10)

Bank interest income in 2009:(Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2009, p. 9)

Bank interest income in 2008:(Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2008, p. 9)

The justification given by the Jamaat:(Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2009, p. 15)

How can that serve as justification? While the income from interest may be small compared to the overall income, it’s the principle that counts. Allah سبحانه و تعلى clearly forbids interest but according to the Ahmadiyya Community receiving interest payments is acceptable if it’s used for the propagation of Islam. Now, ordinary Ahmadis have to ask themselves: If that was permissible, would Allah سبحانه و تعلى not have given the Prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم permission to charge interest in order to help with the wars that the Muslims had to fight? Funds were desperately needed yet Allah سبحانه و تعلى never gave permission to charge interest.

Furthermore we have Lord Tariq Ahmad and leaders of the Ahmadiyya Community allowing the use of interest based mortgages (@ 34:00):

Funny enough, Mirza Masroor, the leader of the Ahmadiyya Cult, himself preaches openly against interest, keeping ordinary Ahmadis in the dark about the Jamaat’s own dealings. They know that most Ahmadis will not question the Jamaat and will not bother looking up the financial statements of the Jamaat. Mirza Masroor devoted a whole Friday sermon on this topic:

“Huzur said usury/interest can result in horrendous consequences, rendering well-off people bankrupt and destroying their family life in the process. (…)
Someone once asked the Promised Messiah (on whom be peace) about borrowing money on interest due to being in a vulnerable position. He responded that Allah arranges for one who relies and puts his/her trust in Allah and that usury/interest was as much of a sin as adultery, theft etc. (…)
Islam allows the eating of the flesh of swine in extreme cases (2:174); however usury/interest is not permissible under any circumstances as the Qur’an states in Surah Al Baqarah (2:279).”

This is another case of Ahmadiyya hypocrisy. Telling their people one thing while practicing the exact opposite. Ahmadis should question their leadership about this. How can they justify receiving interest for the propagation of Islam when Allah سبحانه و تعلى clearly forbids interest. Why does your Khalifa not practice what he preaches?

Many banks in the UK (such as Lloyds TSB or HSBC) offer Islamic business accounts. The Jamaat could have used any of those banks and avoid receiving interest payments. There is really no excuse left for the Jamaat to justify its bank interest income.

Is Ahmadiyya really the true Islam? Evidence, as shown above, speaks to the contrary.

The author reverted from Ahmadiyya to Islam in 2010

The Four False Prophets, Part II: Tulayhah al-Azdi

بسم الله الحد لله و صلاة و سلام على رسول الله و على آله و سلم

The Four False Prophets
Al-Aswad Al-’Ansi Tulayhah al-Azdi Sajjah bint al-Harith Musaylimah al-Kaddhab

This is the second installment in a series of articles on four of the early false prophets from the time of the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه و سلم and Abu Bakr رضى الله عنه. In it, we will discuss their rise, opposition by the Muslims, and eventual defeat.


The next false prophet was Tulayhah al-Azdi from the tribe of Banu Assad near Iraq. Earlier in his life, he had accepted Islam without being called to do so, so he would brag to the Prophet Ahmad صلى الله عليه و سلم, as if he was doing Allah a favor. In response to this, Allah revealed:
Continue reading

The Four False Prophets, Part I: Al-Aswad al-’Ansi

بسم الله الحد لله و صلاة و سلام على رسول الله و على آله و سلم

The Four False Prophets
Al-Aswad Al-’Ansi Tulayhah al-Azdi Sajjah bint al-Harith Musaylimah al-Kaddhab

This is the first installment in a series of articles on four of the early false prophets from the time of the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه و سلم and Abu Bakr رضى الله عنه. In it, we will discuss their rise, opposition by the Muslims, and eventual defeat.


During the 12th year after the Hijrah, Al-Aswad al-’Ansi (الاسود العنسي) from ‘Ans, Yemen claimed to be a prophet. He started his movement slow and secretly, but later grew to engulf all of ‘Ans. At the time, Yemen was ruled by Persian Muslims, notably Shahr bin Badhaan, whose father Badhaan had accepted Islam after receiving a letter from the Prophet Ahmad صلى الله عليه و سلم. But Al-Aswad’s forces attacked the Muslims, killed Shahr, and his forcefully married his Shahr’s wife Azaad.
Continue reading