Here is an example:

1. Allah told us that alcohol was bad–he did not issue a standing order

2. Later, allah ordered muslims to not to come to prayer intoxicated.

3. Later, allah gave a decisive decision on the matter, he said that muslims could not drink alcohol at all.

We follow the later revelations, we dont take these revelations as situational. I think Imam Maliki in his book of tradition writes about the alcohol story.

When you make the claim, ” In my personal opinion arabic was not a perfect language at the time when the Quran was revealed. “, it creates many serious problems. My feeling is that you are not realizing the severity of it. Once you make this claim, it does not leave you with any moral authority to ask other people for a debate on the translation or meaning of a Quranic verse.

Every mujadid that ever existed in the history of Islam endorsed the theory that the Quran contradicted itself, they endorsed the theory of Mansukh, even shah wali ullah endorsed this idea.

So its not just me but every mujadid.

WE CAN WHAT WE WILL DO–CIRCA 1885

I remember that mirza tahir ahmad asked a person if they beat their wife–or he gave an example of this type of questioning. He said that a yes or no answer wasn’t correct at all in this scenario. He was developing a strategy for argumentation.

Lutf, I am smarter than you are, your little tricks aren’t going to work. Go play on the freeway my friend, I don’t have time for your stupidity. Go post on your own forum–oh I forgot–Masroor shut that down when he heard it was a free thing and he wasn’t getting any money for that. Someone told him that it wasn’t like selling books.

MKA should open a college fund and use the money to get masroor some speech classes, a 10 year old could give a better speech than that guy.

WE CAN WHAT WE WILL DO—CIRCA 1885

In my personal opinion arabic was not a perfect language at the time when the Quran was revealed. This is a personal opinion of mine.

1. Why was john the baptist killed unjustly? He didnt last 23 years. His head was cut off.

WE CAN WHAT WE WILL DO–CIRCA 1885

“Arabic was not perfect”.. Do you mean to say that Quran has flaws?

If “This verse could be understood to mean ALL, that is a possibility, ….”, then you should not have wasted your precious time in writing this article.

There are many strong arguments that one can employ while arguing against Ahmadiyya. It is always good to use Muhkamat in our arguments instead of Mutashabihat. It does not help that first you write two pages for supporting an argument and then you inform your readers: ” well …. there is a possibility …….”.

ANOTHER POINT

3:144 was revealed before the status of jesus was revealed to Muhammad. The status of jesus was revealed categorically in 4:157. During the battle of Uhud, Allah had not yet revealed as to Muhammad as to what happened to jesus during the crucifiction. When allah revealed 3:144 muslims had no idea as to what happened with Jesus on the cross. Muslims only knew what the jews and christians believed.

3:55 only gives a conclusion of what happened, but it is not as categorical as 4:157. And it can argued that 3:55 may have been revealed after 3:144.

gotcha

WE CAN WHAT WE WILL DOOOOO