Comments on: Ahmadiyya – A New Religion

By: the famous rationalist

the famous rationalist — Thu, 27 May 2010 16:40:32 +0000

The reference is ROR May 1915 edition i have produced the entire article over on the forum. Mahmud Ahmad also advises all ahmadis to steer clear of muslims. Mahmud wanted to isolate the ahmadis and suck their wallets dry!

By: Peace

Peace — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:37:03 +0000

Yes, maybe the quotes may be correct although not all the times, but most(99.9%) of the time they are taken out of context in order to prove a point which is often unrelated to what the actual point is being made. Now this is sad and injustice, not only to the viewers who begin to believe, but also themselves.

By: rationalist

rationalist — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:45:33 +0000

I totally agree with farhan. I myself am a western ahmadi, the writings of the mirza were hidden from me.

I was told to read:
1. jesus in india
2. philosophy of the teachings of Islam
3. the will

these were the books that were promoted in my time, I was never told to study sahih bukhari, or muslim.

thats a shame!!!!

By: Farhan

Farhan — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:59:00 +0000

I would just like to comment that 99% of quotes from sites critical of Ahmadism are indeed correct. I noticed this after independent review of them.

The problem is, Ahmadis do not permit the translations of most of their books, so the falsehood of their false prophet is locked away in Urdu- away from the eyes of critical Western Ahmadis.

By: Shahid

Shahid — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:50:37 +0000

Brother, drop me an email. I am being very careful for reasons that will become clear after discussion. In fact, I would if possible, prefer to talk on the phone. You have my email address, if you can, please drop me an email and we can discuss further. I can assure you that the source is cast-iron and hitherto suppressed by the Ahmadiyya. Not surprising, it makes them look very bad indeed.

By: Tahir Hussain

Tahir Hussain — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 20:31:43 +0000

^ My mistake for not being clear. I am still waiting to see the source for the screen shot provided by brother Shahid which states the ‘last’ messenger.

By: rationalist

rationalist — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:37:33 +0000

Tahir; what source are you asking for? the references are many.

Please advise, and I will lead you to the proper source.

By: Tahir Hussain

Tahir Hussain — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:33:15 +0000

Source?

By: Rationalist

Rationalist — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:39:27 +0000

Khutbah Ilhamiyya was received in a speech in 1900, the lahoris have the english translation on their website.

The problem is this, both lahoris and qadianis believe that before NOV 1901, all claims to prophethood by mirza kazzab were really only claims to muhadasiyyat. Khutbah Ilhamiyyah was published in 1902.

The ahmadis can argue that this is just metaphoric talk. Even though that is a weak argument.

Mirza Kazzab also claimed to be greater than the Holy Prophet(saw) in this same book.

By: Fuad

Fuad — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:11:36 +0000

@islam976

Mirza claimed in 1902 that he is The Last Prophet, the last brick who completed the building of Islam! He wrote:

((Allah wanted to end the matter and to complete the building [of Islam] through the LAST BRICK. Oh you who witness, I am that LAST BRICK)) – RK, vol 16, Khutba-Ilhamiyya, page 178

http://thecult.info/blog/2009/07/27/mirza-ghulam-the-last-messenger/