Once again, Mirza called the Christian Priests the promised Dajjal who he was promised to kill. He didn’t kill them, he didn’t stop them, he didn’t destroy their arguments, he didn’t trouble them, or impede their progress in any way.

The dajjal that he spoke of run rampant all over the world, distributing Pashtun Bibles in Afghanistan while NATO forces win “hearts and minds” by blowing those “hearts and minds” out of existence with drone bombs. Meanwhile, you worship the haters of Muslims.

Your argumentation is shoddy, your lack of reason is telling and your hatred of Muslims shamelessly transparent.

Mirza Ghulam Yalaash failed miserably in every respect bar making money for his progeny and stealing the ‘eeman of ordinary Muslims with his chicanery.

i didn’t mean hatred man, i fully said that. all i meant by quoting the ayah was to show the higher rank muslims have. brothers in islam share a closer bond between each other than with the kuffar. maybe i shouldn’t have quoted this verse here because it does seem kinda irrelevant. i just felt like you were downplaying the exclusiveness of the muslim brotherhood.

allahu ta’ala allows us to respect the kuffar who have not fought us or driven us out of our homes because of our islam. now, what about the kuffar who have fought us or driven us out of our homes?

You quoted from Quran:

“Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah. And those who are with him are hard against the disbelievers, tender among themselves.” (fath:30)

Indeed the above verse cannot mean to refer to hatred of any sort against non-muslims if this was your intention to ask with the verse that you proposed. Indeed if this implied hatred, then it would be contradictory to the following verse I mentioned earlier:

“Allah forbids you not respecting those who have not fought against you on account of your religion, and who have not driven you out of your homes, that you be kind to them and deal equitably with them; surely, Allah loves those who are equitable.” (60:9)

The verse actually implies that ‘those that are with him’ are brave, firm and courageous against the evils of the bad people – and therefore not suceptibe to their influences. In this sense they are ‘hard’ against those people, for if ‘hard’ meant hatred it would be contradictory.

[Note from admin: Slogan deleted.]

محمد رسول الله والذين معه أشداء على الكفار رحماء بينهم (fath:29)

sects derive as a result of differences in belief – and so could be said….neither all sunni beliefs are entirely accepted by shia or niether hanafi views are accepted fully by maliki and so on.

Do not divert your argument from this blog’s main point, that indeed ‘Love for All, Hatred for None’ is indeed the practice of true muslims as is of Hadhrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad(atba)

[Note from admin: Sloganeering in the footer of comments is not permitted on the blog. The appropriate place for such signatures is the forum, where it is allowed]

“same thing – you are either muslim or sunni or you are either muslim or shia and so on….”

neither sunni nor any other muslim believe in yalash as god or mirza kazzab qaadiani as a “prophet.” i thought you knew that much. you have every right and freedom to take mirza kazzab as your “prophet” but he was no servant of our beloved and blessed Prophet. this is a smoke screen by mirzais to harm muslims. that is why you are unanimously rejected by them. shame upon you.